Intergroup threat,social dominance,and the malleability of ideology: The importance of conceptual replication |
| |
| Authors: | Elodie Roebroeck Serge Guimond |
| |
| Affiliation: | LAPSCO, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont‐Ferrand, France |
| |
| Abstract: | Consistent with the theory of malleable ideology, research has shown that, under intergroup threat, antiegalitarian individuals will exploit the malleable character of color blindness and strategically claim to be strong supporters of it. In three studies conducted in France, we found no support for this theory when measuring color blindness but strong support when using measures of laïcité, an ideology of secularism. Indeed, those who score low on social dominance orientation (SDO) were more likely to support laïcité than antiegalitarian individuals. However, a situational threat (Study 1), a symbolic threat experimentally induced (Study 2), and a perceived symbolic threat (Study 3) were all related to increased support for laïcité by people high in SDO, without affecting those low in SDO. Thus, laïcité is a malleable ideology that can be adopted by individuals having contrasting motivations, as color blindness in the United States. Implications for the role of exact and conceptual replications in the development of a psychological science are discussed. |
| |
| Keywords: | social dominance laï cité color blindness symbolic threat realistic threat |
|
|
