| 梅尔美术判断测验在中国应用的信、效度检验 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 董圣鸿1,' target='_blank'>2,黎 旋1,' target='_blank'>2,郭 璐1,' target='_blank'>3 ,李小雨1,' target='_blank'>2. 梅尔美术判断测验在中国应用的信、效度检验[J]. 心理学探新, 2019, 0(6): 549-555 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 董圣鸿1 ' target='_blank'>2 黎 旋1 ' target='_blank'>2 郭 璐1 ' target='_blank'>3 李小雨1 ' target='_blank'>2 |
| |
| 作者单位： | (1.江西师范大学心理学院,南昌 330022; 2.江西省心理与认知科学重点实验室,南昌 330022; 3.中国移动通信集团江西有限公司景德镇分公司,景德镇 333000) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的:修订梅尔美术判断测验(Meier Art Judgment Test)并对其信度、效度进行检验。方法:通过对来自6所大学、中专共2270人施测梅尔美术判断测验,采用CTT区分度和IRT的模型拟合检验、区分度筛选项目,以霍兰德艺术分测验、学生艺术创作水平自评与艺术过往经历分量表为效标,以及采用效标组法(美术与非美术专业)检验效标关联效度。结果:保留的61题都拟合IRT的2参数logistic模型,量表得分与各效标得分相关显著,美术与非美术专业学生得分存在显著差异; 但测验信息量分析表明,对高能力被试的测量误差相对较大。结论:修订的量表能测量个体的美术判断能力; 今后改进方向应该是增加更难的试题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 美术才能 梅尔美术鉴赏测验 信度 效度 |
Validity and Reliability of Meier Art Judgment Test in China |
| |
| Dong Shenghong1,' target='_blank'>2,Li Xuan1,' target='_blank'>2,Guo Lu1,' target='_blank'>3,Li Xiaoyu1,' target='_blank'>2. Validity and Reliability of Meier Art Judgment Test in China[J]. Exploration of Psychology, 2019, 0(6): 549-555 |
| |
| Authors: | Dong Shenghong1 ' target='_blank'>2 Li Xuan1 ' target='_blank'>2 Guo Lu1 ' target='_blank'>3 Li Xiaoyu1 ' target='_blank'>2 |
| |
| Affiliation: | (1.School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022; 2.Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Psychology and Cognitive Science,Nanchang 330022; 3.Jingdezhen Branch of China Mobile Jiangxi Co.,Ltd,Jingdezhen 333000) |
| |
| Abstract: | Aims:This study revised the Meier Art Judgment Test(MAJT)and tested its reliability and validity.Methods:Artistic type of Holland Code Career Test,Self-evaluation of students' artistic creation level,individual art experience subscale and the MAJT were administered among 2,270 students from 6 college and community college.Selecting items by Classical Test Theory(CTT)and Item Response Theory(IRT)approaches.Testing calibration correlation validity by calibration group method(art and non-art major).Results:All the remained 61 items were fitted with the 2-Parameter Logistic model of IRT.The scale score was significantly correlated with each criterion scale.The scores between art and non-art majored students were significantly different.Nevertheless,the test information showed that the measurement error was relatively large for the high-ability subjects.Conclusion:The revised scale provides a secure base to measure the art judgment ability of individuals.The direction of future improvement should be to add more difficult items. |
| |
| Keywords: | art talents Meier Art Judgment Test reliability validity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《心理学探新》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《心理学探新》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
