首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

全球化、后现代与哲学的文化多元性--简论中国哲学面临的困境与机遇
引用本文:张志伟.全球化、后现代与哲学的文化多元性--简论中国哲学面临的困境与机遇[J].现代哲学,2004(4):58-64.
作者姓名:张志伟
作者单位:中国人民大学哲学系,北京,100872
摘    要:全球化具有两面性:作为现代性之结果的全球化进程向作为本土文化之结晶的中国哲学提出了严重的挑战,但全球化的后现代特征却为中国哲学的回归和重建创造了历史性的机遇。在此背景之下,原来按照西方哲学框架建立起来的中国哲学史学科,面临着转换研究范式和叙述方式的艰巨任务。中国哲学与西方哲学之间的关系不是从属性的,而是相互独立的两种哲学形态,它们具有不同的范式,而且相互之间不可通约。所以,当代的中国哲学研究不应该以西方哲学为典范和标准,而应该以之为参照系和对话伙伴,通过现时代“视域”与古典哲学“视域”的相互“交融”,对于现实的哲学问题给出中国哲学的解答。

关 键 词:全球化  后现代主义  西方哲学  中国哲学
文章编号:1000-7600(2004)04-058-07

Globalization, Postmodernity and Multi-Cultural of Philosophy
ZHANG Zhiwei.Globalization, Postmodernity and Multi-Cultural of Philosophy[J].Modern Philosophy,2004(4):58-64.
Authors:ZHANG Zhiwei
Institution:Zhang zhiwei
Abstract:There is duality in globalization: on one hand, the globalization as the results of modernity severely challenges Chinese Philosophy as the crystallization of native culture; on the other hand, the postmodern characters of globalization provide historical chances for the return and rebuilding of Chinese Philosophy. In this context, Chinese Philosophy, as a discipline whose establishment followed the scheme of Western Philosophy, is faced with the formidable tasks of transforming research paradigm and narrative approaches. This essay argues that Chinese Philosophy and Western Philosophy are mutually independent philosophical patterns rather than in any subordinate position. They have different paradigms which are incommensurable. Therefore, the contemporary Chinese Philosophy researches should not take Western Philosophy as model and standard for themselves, but take it as a frame of reference and a partner in dialogue. Such researches, through the fusion of horizons between classical philosophy and present time, will response to the actual philosophical problems in approaches of Chinese Philosophy.
Keywords:globalization: Postmodernism: Western Philosophy: Chinese Philosphy  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号