亲社会与攻击性儿童在两类假设情境中的社会信息加工特点

采用问卷调查法,分别测查、比较了亲社会儿童、攻击性儿童与一般儿童的社会信息加工(SIP)特点,目的是探讨三类儿童在SIP上是否存在差异。结果表明,在假设分享情境中,攻击性与一般儿童SIP的整体差异不显著,但在对不分享策略的他人情绪预期和关系预期2个变量上差异显著。亲社会与一般儿童、与攻击性儿童SIP的整体差异显著;在假设挑衅情境中,攻击性与一般儿童在对不同策略的自我效能感、选择频率、策略评价等7个变量上差异显著。亲社会与一般儿童在对不同策略的自我效能感、选择频率、策略评价等9个变量上差异显著;亲社会儿童与一般儿童SIP的整体不存在显著差异。

Prosocial and Aggressive Children's Social-Information-Processing in Two Types of Hypothetical Situations

A normative primary school children sample of 572 children(308 boys,264 girls,average age=10.16) participated in this study.Assessments included peer reports of social behavior that was used to divide children into three groups(prosocial,average and aggressive) and self-reports of several elements of social-information-processing(SIP) in hypothetical provocation situation and hypothetical sharing situation.ANOVA and MANOVA were employed to explore the SIP differences among above three groups of children.The results showed that:(1) In hypothetical provocation situation,compared with the average children,aggressive children's global SIP pattern is marginal significantly different and it is the same with prosocial children.Prosocial children's global SIP pattern is significantly different from aggressive children's.(2) In hypothetical sharing situation,compared with the average children,prosocial children's global SIP is significantly different,whereas the aggressive children's is not,which means maybe only prosocial children have the unique SIP pattern which is different from the average children's and aggressive children's.