Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the prospective memory questionnaire |
| |
Authors: | Tom?Buchanan mailto:buchant@wmin.ac.uk" title=" buchant@wmin.ac.uk" itemprop=" email" data-track=" click" data-track-action=" Email author" data-track-label=" " >Email author,Tarick?Ali,Thomas?M.?Heffernan,Jonathan?Ling,Andrew?C.?Parrott,Jacqui?Rodgers,Andrew?B.?Scholey |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, London, England. buchant@wmin.ac.uk |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() There is growing evidence that Internet-mediated psychological tests can have satisfactory psychometric properties and can measure the same constructs as traditional versions. However, equivalence cannot be taken for granted. The prospective memory questionnaire (PMQ; Hannon, Adams, Harrington, Fries-Dias, & Gibson, 1995) was used in an on-line study exploring links between drug use and memory (Rodgers et al., 2003). The PMQ has four factor-analytically derived subscales. In a large (N763) sample tested via the Internet, only two factors could be recovered; the other two subscales were essentially meaningless. This demonstration of nonequivalence underlines the importance of on-line test validation. Without examination of its psychometric properties, one cannot be sure that a test administered via the Internet actually measures the intended construct. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|