首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


That F
Authors:Nathan Salmon
Affiliation:(1) University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
Abstract:Jeffrey King’s principal objection to the direct-reference theory of demonstratives is analyzed and criticized. King has responded with a modified version of his original argument aimed at establishing the weaker conclusion that the direct-reference theory of demonstratives is either incomplete or incorrect. It is argued that this fallback argument also fails.
Contact Information Nathan SalmonEmail:
Keywords:Demonstrative  Determiner phrase  Direct reference  David Kaplan  Jeffrey King  Nathan Salmon
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号