Egg arrangement in avian clutches covaries with the rejection of foreign eggs |
| |
Authors: | Lenka Polačiková Fugo Takasu Bård G. Stokke Arne Moksnes Eivin Røskaft Phillip Cassey Mark E. Hauber Tomáš Grim |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacky University, 17. listopadu 50, Olomouc, 771 46, Czech Republic 2. Centre for Advanced Study (CAS), 0271, Oslo, Norway 3. Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého 1–3, 612 42, Brno, Czech Republic 4. Department of Information and Computer Sciences, Nara Women’s University, Kita-Uoya, Nishimachi, Nara, 630-8506, Japan 5. Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway 6. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia 7. Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, Albany, NY, 10065, USA 8. School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
|
| |
Abstract: | ![]() In birds, the colour, maculation, shape, and size of their eggs play critical roles in discrimination of foreign eggs in the clutch. So far, however, no study has examined the role of egg arrangement within a clutch on host rejection responses. We predicted that individual females which maintain consistent egg arrangements within their clutch would be better able to detect and reject foreign eggs than females without a consistent egg arrangement (i.e. whose eggs change positions more often across incubation). We tested this “egg arrangement hypothesis” in blackbirds (Turdus merula) and song thrush (T. philomelos). Both species are suitable candidates for research on egg rejection, because they show high inter-individual variation and individual repeatability in egg rejection responses. As predicted, using our custom-defined metrics of egg arrangement, rejecter females’ clutches showed significantly more consistent patterns in egg arrangement than acceptor females’ clutches. Only parameters related to blunt pole showed consistent differences between rejecters and acceptors. This finding makes biological sense because it is already known that song thrush use blunt pole cues to reject foreign eggs. We propose that a disturbance of the original egg arrangement pattern by the laying parasite may alert host females that maintain a consistent egg arrangement to the risk of having been parasitized. Once alerted, these hosts may shift their discrimination thresholds to be more restrictive so as to reject a foreign egg with higher probability. Future studies will benefit from experimentally testing whether these two and other parasitized rejecter host species may rely on the use of consistent egg arrangements as a component of their anti-parasitic defence mechanisms. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|