Transposition of flower height by bumble bee foragers (Bombus impatiens)

Honeybees learn visual characteristics of reinforced and non-reinforced flowers in differential conditioning experiments (i.e., experiments that require subjects to choose between a reinforced and non-reinforced flower). In this study bumble bee foragers (Bombus impatiens) were trained in a transposition paradigm to determine if the relational properties of flowers also influence choice behavior. Subjects in one group (group A) were trained with repeated choices between a medium-height flower replete with sucrose solution and an empty tall flower until the medium-height flower was sampled preferentially in five consecutive trials. A second group (group B) was trained on the medium height flower alone for five trials. In a single test trial subjects were given a choice between the medium-height flower and a short flower, each filled with water. A control group showed no preference in this test. Group B subjects showed a significant preference for the medium-height flower and group A subjects that exhibited flower constancy (i.e., sampled only the medium-height flower in training trials) showed an identical pattern of choice. Subjects in group A that sampled both flowers during training, in contrast, transposed flower height and preferred the short flower. These results suggest that the choice behavior of bumble bee foragers is influenced by relational and absolute properties of flowers. The flower characteristics learned by foragers appear to depend on the difficulty of the discrimination problem and the context in which flowers are sampled. Patches of flowers limited in phenotypic variability may produce simple associative learning and flower constancy by foragers. Received: 17 September 1999 / Accepted after revision: 22 June 2000