首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

促进型和抑制型建言的差异
引用本文:李方君,钟旭朋.促进型和抑制型建言的差异[J].心理科学进展,2020,28(11):1939-1952.
作者姓名:李方君  钟旭朋
作者单位:暨南大学管理学院, 广州 510632
基金项目:* 国家自然科学基金项目(71971099);广东省自然科学基金重大项目(2017A030308013)
摘    要:本文系统地回顾了促进型和抑制型建言在前因与后果上的差异。这些差异的理论基础包括计划行为理论、调节焦点理论、目标导向理论、社会期望理论、资源保存理论、归因理论、自我损耗理论、认知评价理论以及情感事件理论。与理论相对应, 两类建言前因的差异体现在建言者特质(如人格、动机)、领导风格与行为、领导成员交换和组织层面的因素(如组织政治、组织公平)等方面; 后果的差异体现在建言者工作态度与行为(如绩效、工作满意度)、领导建言采纳和团队绩效等方面。未来可能的研究方向包括:探讨两类建言在团队中的共存、两类建言的文化差异等。

关 键 词:建言行为  促进型建言  抑制型建言  理论机制  
收稿时间:2020-01-06

The distinction between promotive and prohibitive voice
LI Fangjun,ZHONG Xupeng.The distinction between promotive and prohibitive voice[J].Advances In Psychological Science,2020,28(11):1939-1952.
Authors:LI Fangjun  ZHONG Xupeng
Institution:Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Abstract:This paper systematically reviews the distinction between promotive and prohibitive voice. The theoretical foundation of their distinction includes planned behavior theory, regulatory focus theory, goal-oriented theory, socially desirable responding theory, conservation of resources theory, attribution theory, self-depletion theory, transactional theory of stress, and affect events theory. Corresponding to the theories, their antecedents differ in characteristics of voicer (e.g. personality, motivation), leadership style and behavior, leader-member exchange, and organizational factors (e.g. organizational politics, organizational justice); their consequences differ in work attitude and behavior (e.g. performance, job satisfaction), manager's endorsement, team performance. Promising research directions include how the two types of voice coexist in team and the cultural differences between them.
Keywords:voice behavior  promotive voice  prohibitive voice  theoretical mechanism  
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心理科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号