PREFERENTISM AND SELF‐SACRIFICE |
| |
Authors: | CHRIS HEATHWOOD |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Philosophy, University of Colorado at Boulder |
| |
Abstract: | According to the argument from self‐sacrifice, standard, unrestricted desire‐based theories of welfare fail because they have the absurd implication that self‐sacrifice is conceptually impossible. I attempt to show that, in fact, the simplest imaginable, completely unrestricted desire‐based theory of well‐being is perfectly compatible with the phenomenon of self‐sacrifice – so long as the theory takes the right form. I go on to consider a new argument from self‐sacrifice against this simple theory, which, I argue, also fails. I conclude that, contrary to popular opinion, considerations of self‐sacrifice do not pose a problem for preferentist theories of welfare. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|