Disparity in occupational training and career planning between contingent and permanent employees |
| |
| Authors: | Marianna Virtanen Mika Kivimäki Pekka Virtanen Marko Elovainio Jussi Vahtera |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland;2. Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland;3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Tampere, Finland;4. University of Helsinki and National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland;5. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Turku, Finland |
| |
| Abstract: | In modern work life, a common structure of staffing comprises a core of permanent employees and a fluctuating number of contingent workers. We examined the degree to which participation in occupational training and career planning differed between these two groups. The study cohort comprised 5127 hospital employees (96% full time), of whom 4211 were permanent, 677 had a contingent contract, and 239 were contingent at baseline but got a permanent job during the 4-year follow-up period. Results show that contingent employees participated less in occupational training and career planning than permanent employees. The difference remained significant even after 6 years' employment in the hospital. Those contingent employees who became permanently employed did not differ from the permanent employees in occupational training and career planning. These trends in human resource allocation support the human capital theory. They also point to an unintended mechanism potentially increasing inequalities in the workforce, arising from the different human capital investments depending on the employment status. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
