Further evidence of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory’s validity problems: A meta-analytic investigation—Response to Miller, Maples, and Campbell (this issue) |
| |
| Authors: | Seth A. Rosenthal R. Matthew Montoya Leigh E. Ridings Stacey M. Rieck Jill M. Hooley |
| |
| Affiliation: | aCenter for Public Leadership, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, United States;bDepartment of Psychology, University of Dayton, United States;cDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, United states |
| |
| Abstract: | Miller, Maples, and Campbell (this issue) present evidence that Rosenthal and Hooley’s (2010) concerns regarding the Narcissistic Personality Inventory’s (NPI) relation to psychological health may be unwarranted. To resolve this issue empirically, we conducted a meta-analysis (k = 54, N = 38,932). Meta-analytic results revealed that a subset of NPI items were indeed problematic; items that function poorly at differentiating narcissists from non-narcissists accounted entirely for the NPI’s connection to psychological health. These items were also strongly associated with self-esteem, but unrelated to aggression/anger. In contrast, the remaining NPI items were unrelated to psychological health, but associated with aggression/anger. We conclude that although the NPI measures narcissism, its poorest functioning items also link it to outcomes unrelated to narcissism. |
| |
| Keywords: | Narcissism Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) Psychological health Self-esteem Aggression Grandiose narcissism Pathological narcissism Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) Normal narcissism Meta-analysis |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
