A United Methodist approach to end-of-life decisions: intentional ambiguity or ambiguous intentions. |
| |
Authors: | James R Thobaben |
| |
Abstract: | The position of the United Methodist Church on end-of-life decisions is best described as intentional ambiguity or ambiguous intentions or both. The paper analyzes the official position of the denomination and then considers the actions of a U.M.C. bishop who served as a foreman for a trial of Dr. Jack Kevorkian. In an effort to find some common ground within an increasingly divided denomination, the work concludes with a consideration of the work of John Wesley and his approach to human death. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|