The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer |
| |
Authors: | Vladimir?M.?Sloutsky mailto:sloutsky.@osu.edu" title=" sloutsky.@osu.edu" itemprop=" email" data-track=" click" data-track-action=" Email author" data-track-label=" " >Email author,Jennifer?A.?Kaminski,Andrew?F.?Heckler |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Psychology Department, University of Wales Swansea, SA2 8PP Swansea, Wales;(2) Sowerby Research Centre, British Aerospace, Bristol, England |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() A goal of successful learning is the transfer of learned knowledge to novel situations. However, spontaneous transfer is notoriously difficult to achieve. In this research, we argue that learning and transfer can be facilitated when knowledge is expressed in an abstract, generic form. In Experiments 1 and 2, undergraduate students learned two isomorphic domains, which were based on the same algebraic group, with one domain expressed in a more abstract, generic form and the other expressed in a more concrete form. In both experiments, transfer from more abstract to more concrete was greater than the reverse. In Experiment 3, undergraduate students learned the same algebraic group under varying degrees of concreteness. Our results demonstrate that the use of perceptually rich, concrete symbols may hinder learning. This research indicates that concreteness may have substantial learning and transfer costs, whereas abstractness may have benefits. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|