|
|||||
|
|
| 责任心子维度与绩效的关系研究中存在的争议 | |
| 引用本文： | 翁汀辉 肖武平 张丽花. 责任心子维度与绩效的关系研究中存在的争议[J]. 社会心理科学, 2006, 21(6): 11-14,62 |
| 作者姓名： | 翁汀辉 肖武平 张丽花 |
| 作者单位： | 江西师范大学教科院心理系,南昌330027 |
| 摘 要： | 在责任心及其子维度与工作绩效的关系研究中，研究者在下面四个方面还存在争议：1．责任心的结构定义，也就是责任心总维度包含哪些子维度？2．为什么子维度的信度系数比责任心总维度的低？3．对于具体的，较细的工作绩效效标，大维度还是小维度有更好的预测效度？4．用于检验哪一种预测源更有效的方法，计算简单相关系数还是增量效度？文章主要就这些问题进行讨论。 |
| 关 键 词： | 责任心 工作绩效 增量效度 |
The relationships between conscientiousness and its sub-traits and performance |
|
| WengTinghui ,XiaoWuping, ZhangLihua. The relationships between conscientiousness and its sub-traits and performance[J]. Science of Social Psychology, 2006, 21(6): 11-14,62 | |
| Authors: | WengTinghui XiaoWuping ZhangLihua |
| Affiliation: | Jiangxi normal university 330027 |
| Abstract: | In the study of the relationships between conscientiousness and its sub-traits and performance, The researchers disagree on four concerns nertaining to conscientiousness:1)the construct deftnition of consci- entiousness,that is,what specific sub-traits underlie the construct,2)why the coefficient alpha reliabilities for sub-trait measures arelower than broad trait mear- sures?3)which predictor breadth results in better pre- diction of specific,narrow job performance criteria?4) the best technique to examine which predictor results in better prediction,using alpha coefficient or incre- mental validity.The overarching purpose of the present paper was to explore these concerns. |
| Keywords: | conscientiousness performance incremental validity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ | |