| Abstract: | The information transmitted in absolute identification quickly reaches its upper limit as the number of (one-dimensional) signals, and their range, is increased. Several explanations have been given of this phenomenon, but all are ad hoc in one way or another. Here we present a ‘memory’ or ‘rehearsal’ interpretation. The basic (psychological) representation of each signal in an absolute identification experiment is assumed to be quite accurate, and independent of the other stimuli used in the experiment. However, the identification of the stimulus presented on a particular trial is relative to a ‘frame’ (usually the range of stimuli in that experiment) that the subject must ‘rehearse’ using a fixed capacity rehearsal system. In special cases, this model reduces to earlier suggestions, but its general motivation seems somewhat less ad hoc than that of earlier ideas, and it is also easily applied to the absolute identification of multivariate signals and to magnitude estimation. |
