Geometric and featural representations in semantic concepts |
| |
Authors: | Wolf Vanpaemel Timothy Verbeemen Matthew Dry Tom Verguts Gert Storms |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;(2) Department of Psychology, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() We explore the adequacy of two types of similarity representation in the context of semantic concepts. To this end, we evaluate different categorization models, assuming either a geometric or a featural representation, using categorization decisions involving familiar and unfamiliar foods and animals. The study aims to assess the optimal stimulus representation as a function of the familiarity of the stimuli. For the unfamiliar stimuli, the geometric categorization models provide the best account of the categorization data, whereas for the familiar stimuli, the featural categorization models provide the best account. This pattern of results suggests that people rely on perceptual information to assign an unfamiliar stimulus to a category but rely on more elaborate conceptual knowledge when assigning a familiar stimulus. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|