Identification of cognitive profiles among women considering BRCA1/2 testing through the utilisation of cluster analytic techniques |
| |
Authors: | Pagona Roussi Kerry A. Sherman Karen Hurley Mary B. Daly Andrew Godwin |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology , Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki, Greece;2. Department of Psychology , Macquarie University , Sydney, Australia;3. Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital , Sydney, Australia;4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science , Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY;5. Department of Clinical Genetics , Fox Chase Cancer Center , 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111;6. Department of Medical Oncology , Clinical Molecular Genetics , 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111 |
| |
Abstract: | Based on the cognitive-social health information processing model, we identified cognitive profiles of women at risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Prior to genetic counselling, participants (N?=?171) completed a study questionnaire concerning their cognitive and affective responses to being at genetic risk. Using cluster analysis, four cognitive profiles were generated: (a) high perceived risk/low coping; (b) low value of screening/high expectancy of cancer; (c) moderate perceived risk/moderate efficacy of prevention/low informativeness of test result; and (d) high efficacy of prevention/high coping. The majority of women in Clusters One, Two and Three had no personal history of cancer, whereas Cluster Four consisted almost entirely of women affected with cancer. Women in Cluster One had the highest number of affected relatives and experienced higher levels of distress than women in the other three clusters. These results highlight the need to consider the psychological profile of women undergoing genetic testing when designing counselling interventions and messages. |
| |
Keywords: | breast and ovarian cancer risk cluster analysis cognitive profile genetic testing psychological distress |
|
|