The relationship between abusive supervision,distributive justice and job satisfaction: A substitutes for leadership approach |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;2. University of Twente, Department of Educational Science, The Netherlands;1. Department of Management, Strome College of Business, Old Dominion University, 2171 Constant Hall, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA;2. Department of Management, College of Business, Florida State University, 821 Academic Way, P.O. Box 3061110, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1110, USA;1. University of New Hampshire, Peter T. Paul College of Business and Economics, Department of Management, Durham, NH 03824, USA;2. Indiana University Southeast, School of Business, Department of Management, USA;3. University of South Alabama, Mitchell College of Business, Department of Management, USA;4. UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() IntroductionRecently, interest in abusive supervision has grown (Tepper, 2007). However, little is still known about organizational factors that can reduce the adverse effects of abusive supervision.ObjectiveBased on a substitute for leadership perspective (Kerr & Jermier, 1978), we predict that job resources adequacy and role clarity act as buffers in the negative relationship between abusive supervision, distributive justice and job satisfaction.MethodA sample of 253 employees from a City Hall was used to test our hypotheses.ResultsWe found that abusive supervision was significant and negatively related to distributive justice when job resources adequacy and role clarity were low, but not when job resources adequacy and role clarity were high, with consequences for job satisfaction.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that job resources adequacy and role clarity can reduce the negative impact of abusive supervision, which then lessens distributive unfairness perceptions and job dissatisfaction. |
| |
Keywords: | Abusive supervision Substitutes for leadership Job resources adequacy Role clarity Distributive justice Job satisfaction Supervision abusive Substituts du leadership Adéquation des ressources du travail Clarté des rôles Justice distributive Satisfaction au travail |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|