The Role of Stimulus Specificity on Infidelity Reactions: Seeing is Disturbing |
| |
Authors: | Joseph F. Landolfi Glenn Geher Alice Andrews |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) State University of New York at New Paltz, New Paltz, NY, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Past research has found that males are more distressed by imagined scenarios of sexual infidelity compared with females, while females are more distressed by imagined scenarios of emotional infidelity. Expanding on the methodology originally employed by Buss et al. (Psychological Science, 3, 251–255, 1992), we examined sex differences in reactions to imagined infidelity by addressing the effects of visual images of potential interlopers. Additionally, this research measured affective responses in a continuous format by examining psychological discomfort. Participants in high-visual imagery and control conditions imagined infidelity (both emotional and sexual) and then reported levels of discomfort. Further, two indices of autonomic nervous system responding were assessed (skin conductance and pulse rate). Ninety-three (53 females, 40 males) college students participated. Visual stimuli produced greater psychological distress than thought-produced stimuli for all participants, especially males. Sex differences in reactions to infidelity consistent with past research were obtained for the categorical and continuous psychological indices. Implications for research in this area are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | Stimulus specificity Infidelity reactions Sexual infidelity Emotional infidelity |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|