Describing citation structures in sport burnout literature: A citation network analysis |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Karlstad University, Universitetsgatan 2, 651 88, Karlstad, Sweden;2. Indiana University Kokomo, 2300 S Washington St, Kokomo, IN, 46904, USA;3. Queen''s University, 28 Division Street, Kingston, ON, Canada, K7M 8C8;1. Department of Psychology, 1155 Union Circle, #311280, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA;2. Department of Kinesiology, California State University-Northridge, USA;3. Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA;4. Department of Health Promotion and Education, University of Utah, USA;5. Center for Balanced Living, Worthington, OH, USA;1. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Rd., Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA;2. Trinity University, One Trinity Place, San Antonio, TX 78212-2100, USA;1. Department of Kinesiology, East Carolina University, United States;2. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectivesTo evaluate sport burnout research using citation network analysis.DesignA citation network analysis.MethodsWe began by searching the term “sport and burnout” in SportDiscus, Physical Education Index, and PsycINFO. From the returned search, we then selected and analyzed all peer-reviewed English articles that were published before 2012. This allowed us to create a network of inter-citations.ResultsOur search yielded 102 articles, of which there were 11 reviews (11%), 13 qualitative articles (13%), 76 quantitative articles (75%), and two mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) articles (2%). The 11 most cited articles were published between 1984 and 2006, appearing in 5 journals (7 of them in the same journal). Merely 2 of the most cited articles investigated coach burnout. Top-cited articles typically conducted original research using male and female individual sport athletes and were published by North American authors, with two recent exceptions. The most cited article, and also most influential burnout model, was Smith's (1986) cognitive-affective stress model.ConclusionsThe findings show that following an initial focus on coach burnout, more recent studies examine athletes. In this paper we have identified some strengths amongst the most cited papers, including a wide range of publication dates and a focus on both male and female athletes; however, there were also limitations such as a scarcity of articles investigating team sport athletes. |
| |
| Keywords: | Coaching Elite athletes Emotions Overtraining Positive psychology Youth sport |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
