| Abstract: | This study has 2 central goals: 1) to demonstrate the utility of using direct indicators of assimilation; and 2) to distinguish more clearly between the social characteristics, assimilationist and minority status perspectives. The 1970 Public Use Samples (US Bureau of the Census, 1972) provide the data. Race, ethnic identification and place of birth serve as the criteria for defining ethnicity: Mexican American ethnicity is determined by the response to an ethnic-identification item; Japanese American ethnicity is determined by racial identification; and majority white ethnicity is determined by racial identification, place of birth and of parents' birth and by mutual exclusivity with the other ethnic groups. The analysis is restricted to women between the ages of 35 and 45 who were currently married with spouse present at the time of the 1970 census. 2 indicators of assimilation are marital assimilation and residential segregation, including intermarriage. 3 levels of marital assimilation were measured using dummy variables: 1) endogamous marriage of Mexican American or Japanese American women; 2) exogenous marriage with a male who is not a majority white; and 3) marriage with a majority white. Residential segregation provides a somewhat less direct indicator of assimilation. The data indicate the extent to which each respondent's neighborhood is ethnically segregated. The % of the population in the neighborhood that belongs to a given ethnic category was recorded. Generation of residence, and socioeconomic and marital characteristics were used as control variables. The 3 groups differ markedly in fertility, status, marital patterns and assimilation. The Japanese Americans have an average of 2.38 children, a level that is 7 below the majority white mean and 3.11 below that of the Mexican American women. The Japanese women also possess the highest status levels and most stable marital profile. Both Japanese and Mexican Americans live in neighborhoods that are considerably more ethnic than those in which the majority whites live. Among Mexican American women, the foreign-born and native components differ very little on any dimension--fertility, status, marital factors, or assimilation levels, and the cross-sectional data provide no indication of convergence with majority whites. However, native-born Japanese women have considerably higher status levels, more stable marriages, and higher fertility than the foreign-born women. The relationships between assimilation and fertility support the hypothesis that convergence in fertility levels will accompany assimilation. |
