Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change |
| |
Authors: | James E Maddux Ronald W Rogers |
| |
Affiliation: | Texas Tech University USA;University of Alabama USA |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() The effects of fear appeals on persuasion were investigated in a factorial experiment that was designed to test a combined model of protection motivation theory and self-efficacy theory. As predicted, the probability of a threat's occurrence and the effectiveness of a coping response both had positive main effects on intentions to adopt a recommended preventive health behavior. More importantly, the findings provided support for self-efficacy expectancy as a fourth component of protection motivation theory: Self-efficacy had a direct influence on intentions and interacted with two other variables of protection motivation theory. The interaction effect was interpreted in terms of two new decision-making strategies that people use when confronted with a fear appeal: a precaution strategy and a hyperdefensiveness strategy. In addition, the results replicated previous findings on the relationship between self-efficacy expectancy and outcome expectancy. A model incorporating protection motivation theory and self-efficacy theory is presented as a possible general model of attitude change. |
| |
Keywords: | Requests for reprints should be sent to James E. Maddux Department of Psychology Texas Tech University Lubbock TX 79409. |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |