Prevalence of Rape Myths in Headlines and Their Effects on Attitudes Toward Rape |
| |
Authors: | Renae Franiuk Jennifer L. Seefelt Joseph A. Vandello |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology, Aurora University, Aurora, IL, 60506, USA 2. University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI, USA 3. Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | The present research investigated the prevalence and effects of rape myths in newspaper headlines. In study 1, a content analysis of online news headlines from US media (N?=?555) surrounding the 2003–2004 Kobe Bryant sexual assault case showed that 10% endorsed a rape myth. In study 2, students at a mid-sized university in the mid-western USA (N?=?154) read headlines endorsing or not endorsing rape myths. Male participants exposed to myth-endorsing headlines were (a) less likely to think Bryant was guilty than those exposed to non-myth headlines, (b) more likely to hold rape-supportive attitudes than those exposed to non-myth headlines, and (c) more likely to hold rape-supportive attitudes than were female participants exposed to myth-endorsing headlines. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|