The Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance: Concurrent Validity |
| |
Authors: | Douglas Cullinan Mark Harniss Michael H. Epstein Gail Ryser |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Curriculum and Instruction, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC;(2) Educational Program, University of Washington-Tacoma, Tacoma, WA;(3) Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE;(4) PRO-ED, Austin, TX |
| |
Abstract: | The Scale for Assessing Emotional Disturbance (SAED) is a standardized, norm-referenced measure designed to operationalize the federal definition of Emotional Disturbance. It has demonstrated content validity and reliability. The two studies reported here address the SAED's concurrent validity. Samples in each study consisted of students identified with Emotional Disturbance. In both studies, special education teachers rated students on the SAED and a second measure of children's emotional and behavior problems. In the first study the SAED was compared to the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Correlations were generally moderate to high for similar subscales and low for dissimilar subscales. In the second study, the SAED was compared to the Teacher Report Form. Again, correlations generally were as expected and compatible with results of the first study. Results indicate that the SAED emotional and behavior problem subscales measure constructs akin to emotional and behavior problems measured by similar collections of item on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist and Teacher Report Form. Implications of results and recommendations for use of the SAED are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | emotional disturbance students measurement rating scale validity |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|