Re-examination of the role of the instrumental contingency in the sodium-appetite irrelevant incentive effect

Thirsty rats were trained to perform one action—either lever pressing or chain pulling—for a sodium chloride solution and the other for water on a concurrent random interval schedule. When the experimental groups were tested in extinction under a sodium appetite, the instrumental action trained with the sodium solution was not performed at a significantly higher rate than that reinforced by water relative to control groups tested while thirsty. In a second experiment all animals were tested in extinction under a sodium appetite after training with either a sodium solution and water in the experimental condition or a potassium chloride solution and water in the control condition. The experimental animals chain-pulled more rapidly on test than the control rats, irrespective of whether this action was reinforced with the sodium solution or with water. These results confirm the findings of Dickinson and Nicholas (1983a) that the instrumental contingency plays little role in the irrelevant incentive effect based upon a sodium appetite.