A critical evaluation of some commonly-employed methods for the assessment of type a coronary-prone behaviour |
| |
Authors: | R. Mark Herbertt |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide,South Australia 5000 |
| |
Abstract: | Type A coronary-prone behaviour has been repeatedly associated with an increased incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) amongst middle-aged men and women. This association appears to be independent of other standard CHD risk factors such as smoking, high blood pressure and elevated serum cholesterol levels. This paper presents normative and correlational data for a number of commonly-employed self-report measures of Type A behaviour and the structured interview. These data replicate U.S. findings that self-report measures tend to correlate only moderately with the Structured-Interview method of assessment of Type A behaviour. The implications of these data for researchers attempting to assess Type A behaviour, especially with limited resources, are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|