Vibrotactile vigilance: The effects of costs and values on signals

Vibrotactile vigilance behavior was examined for the effects on signal detection performance of placing costs on misses and false detections and a positive value on the correct detection of a signal. Analyses over time showing that the frequencies of correct detection and false detection of signals decreased, while response times increased, indicated that increased costs for misses and false alarms lead to poorer correct detection performance, while the value placed on the correct detection of a signal had little effect. The d’ statistic of signal detection theory was invariant with both signal costs and time, while β varied with both factors.These results imply that the performance decrement during a vigil was due to an increased strictness in the criterion (β) the S set for deciding whether or not a signal was present. The cost factors were effective in manipulating performance during the watch by causing changes in the S’s decision criteria. Findings from this study clearly support those predicted by the “Decision Theory” of Swets, Tanner, and Birdsall (1961); this is suggested as perhaps being the best available basis for a theory of vigilance at this time.