首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

论焦循对“卦变”说之批评及其《易》学建构
引用本文:庾潍诚.论焦循对“卦变”说之批评及其《易》学建构[J].周易研究,2002,30(5):22-29.
作者姓名:庾潍诚
作者单位:新加坡国立大学 中文系,新加坡
摘    要:焦循破除汉人“卦变”说之非,在《易》学史上颇具远识及贡献。他自己创立的另一套解《易》体系,有以下特点:(一)这是一套“之卦”学说,而不是“卦变”说。它是在既定和已生成的64卦基础上,用阴阳互变的“爻动”(爻之)关系解释《周易》经传,不存在卦与卦的相生成问题。(二)焦循这套学说,虽然体系繁密,但不符合历史事实,且多为强《易》就例、牵强附会之论。(三)焦循并没有最后解决《易》学史上“卦变”说的千古难题。

关 键 词:焦循  卦变  之卦
文章编号:1003-3882(2002)05-0022-08
修稿时间:2001年12月18

On JIAO Xun's criticism on the theory of transforming among the hexagrams and the establishment of his I Ching learning
YU Wei-cheng.On JIAO Xun's criticism on the theory of transforming among the hexagrams and the establishment of his I Ching learning[J].Studies of Zhouyi,2002,30(5):22-29.
Authors:YU Wei-cheng
Abstract:JIAO Xun showed his deep insight and contributions in the history of I Ching (the Book of Change) learning by his criticism against the theory of transforming among the hexagrams popular in the Han Dynasty and established another system to interpret Yi. The characteristics of the system are as follows: (1) it is a theory of transformed hexagrams, but not hexagrams transforming, for he, on the basis of the definite and transformed 64 hexagrams, interprets the Text and Commentaries of Zhouyi with the transforming between Yin and Yang, thus it is not about the mutual producing between hexagrams; (2) though this system is diverse and complicated, its contents do not accord with the historical facts, and stretches the meaning to yield to his own rules; (3) JIAO Xun did not solve the problem of the theory of transforming among the hexagrams through ages in the history of I Ching learning after all.
Keywords:JIAO Xun  theory of the hexagrams' transforming  theory of transformed hexa-grams
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号