Braiding Two Evidence-Based Programs for Families At-Risk: Results of a Cluster Randomized Trial |
| |
Authors: | Kate Guastaferro Betty S. Lai Katy Miller Jenelle Shanley Chatham Daniel J. Whitaker Shannon Self-Brown Allison Kemner John R. Lutzker |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Methodology Center,The Pennsylvania State University,University Park,USA;2.School of Public Health,George University,Atlanta,USA;3.Parents as Teachers National Center,St. Louis University,St. Louis,USA |
| |
Abstract: | Child maltreatment is a significant public health problem best addressed through evidence-based parent-support programs. There is a wide range of programs with different strengths offering a variety of options for families. Choosing one single evidence-based program often limits the range of services available to meet the unique needs of families. This paper presents findings from a study to examine the systematic braiding of two evidence-based programs, Parents as Teachers and SafeCare at Home (PATSCH), with the goal to provide a more robust intervention for higher risk families. A cluster randomized effectiveness trial was conducted to examine if PATSCH improved parenting behaviors known to decrease the risk for child maltreatment compared to Parents as Teachers (PAT) Alone. Parents (N?=?159; 92 PAT Alone; 67 PATSCH) were enrolled to complete a baseline, 6-month and 12-month assessment. Results indicate the groups did not differ on number of environmental hazards in the home, parents’ health care decision-making abilities, child abuse potential, and physical assault over time. However, with regard to the potential for child abuse, the PATSCH group showed a decrease in nonviolence discipline and increase in psychological aggression compared to the PAT group. Further research is needed to better examine this concept and its implications for the field. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|