| 攻击性儿童与亲社会儿童社会信息加工特点比较及研究展望 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 寇彧,谭晨,马艳.攻击性儿童与亲社会儿童社会信息加工特点比较及研究展望[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(1):59-65. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 寇彧 谭晨 马艳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京师范大学发展心理研究所,北京,100875 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 全国教育科学规划“十五”重点项目(DBB010520)，北京市教育科学“十五”规划重点课题(ABA03009)，北京师大青年教师社科基金项目(010107198) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 攻击性儿童和亲社会儿童的社会信息加工过程(SIP)存在不同：攻击性儿童具有敌意的归因倾向、破坏关系的目标定向和对攻击性反应做积极评价的特点；而亲社会儿童则表现出友善的归因倾向、加强关系的目标定向和对亲社会行为做积极评价的特点。进一步的研究应该注意分离情绪、人格、年龄、性别等因素的效应；扩展SIP模型的研究领域以探讨儿童社会适应与其社会信息加工过程的关系；提高研究的生态效度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 亲社会儿童 攻击性儿童 社会信息加工特点。 |
| 收稿时间： | 2004-3-27 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年3月27日 |
Differences Between Aggressive and Prosocial Children's Social Information-Processing: Comparison, Analysis and research Expectations |
| |
| KOU Yu,Tan Chen,Ma Yan.Differences Between Aggressive and Prosocial Children''''s Social Information-Processing: Comparison, Analysis and research Expectations[J].Advances In Psychological Science,2005,13(1):59-65. |
| |
| Authors: | KOU Yu Tan Chen Ma Yan |
| |
| Institution: | Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875 |
| |
| Abstract: | The Social Information Processing （SIP） is different between aggressive children and prosocial children: The aggressive children show hostile attribution bias, and their goal orientation is related to the damage of peer relationship. They evaluate aggressive behavior positively. The prosocial children show kind attribution tendency, and their goal orientation lead to peer relationship enhance. They evaluate prosocial behavior more positively. Further research should split the affection of emotion, personality, age, gender and so on, enlarge research category of the relationship of children’s social adaptation and their SIP, and improve the ecological validity of the research. |
| |
| Keywords: | aggressive children prosocial children social information-processing |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《心理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《心理科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
