首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Neurophysiologic markers of primary motor cortex for laryngeal muscles and premotor cortex in caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus investigated in motor speech disorder: a navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study
Authors:Maja Rogić Vidaković  Ana Jerković  Tomislav Jurić  Igor Vujović  Joško Šoda  Nikola Erceg  Andreja Bubić  Marina Zmajević Schönwald  Pantelis Lioumis  Dragan Gabelica  Zoran Đogaš
Affiliation:1.School of Medicine, Laboratory for Human and Experimental Neurophysiology (LAHEN), Department of Neuroscience,University of Split,Split,Croatia;2.Faculty of Philosophy,University of Zagreb,Zagreb,Croatia;3.Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Department of Electronics,University of Split,Split,Croatia;4.Faculty of Maritime Studies, Signal Processing, Analysis and Advanced Diagnostics Research and Education Laboratory (SPAADREL),University of Split,Split,Croatia;5.Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,University of Split,Split,Croatia;6.Clinical Medical Centre “Sisters of Mercy”, Department of Neurosurgery,Clinical Unit for Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring,Zagreb,Croatia;7.Bio Mag Laboratory HUS Medical Imaging center,Helsinki University Hospital,HUS, Helsinki,Finland;8.SGM Medical Monitoring,Split,Croatia
Abstract:Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies have so far reported the results of mapping the primary motor cortex (M1) for hand and tongue muscles in stuttering disorder. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for locating the M1 for laryngeal muscle and premotor cortical area in the caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus, corresponding to Broca’s area in stuttering subjects by applying new methodology for mapping these motor speech areas. Sixteen stuttering and eleven control subjects underwent rTMS motor speech mapping using modified patterned rTMS. The subjects performed visual object naming task during rTMS applied to the (a) left M1 for laryngeal muscles for recording corticobulbar motor-evoked potentials (CoMEP) from cricothyroid muscle and (b) left premotor cortical area in the caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus while recording long latency responses (LLR) from cricothyroid muscle. The latency of CoMEP in control subjects was 11.75 ± 2.07 ms and CoMEP amplitude was 294.47 ± 208.87 µV, and in stuttering subjects CoMEP latency was 12.13 ± 0.75 ms and 504.64 ± 487.93 µV CoMEP amplitude. The latency of LLR in control subjects was 52.8 ± 8.6 ms and 54.95 ± 4.86 in stuttering subjects. No significant differences were found in CoMEP latency, CoMEP amplitude, and LLR latency between stuttering and control-fluent speakers. These results indicate there are probably no differences in stuttering compared to controls in functional anatomy of the pathway used for transmission of information from premotor cortex to the M1 cortices for laryngeal muscle representation and from there via corticobulbar tract to laryngeal muscles.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号