Interaction of fixation point and stimulus orientation the appearance of rectilinearity

Data from two experiments indicate that the findings of Prytulak (1973) are generalizable to stimulus lines at all orientations: (a) when setting a response dot so that it appears to lie on an imaginary extension of a stimulus line, Ss misplace the dot on the side of the extension opposite the fixation point (a contralateral response, or CR) when the fixation point is in the vicinity of the stimulus line and on the same side of the extension as the fixation point (an ipsflateral response, or IR) when the fixation point is in the vicinity of the response dot; (b) CR is larger than IR; (c) fixation of the stimulus line or any point on its extension produces relatively accurate settings. New findings were: (a) the magnitude of CR decreased as the orientation of the stimulus line approached the vertical or horizontal; (b) the magnitude of CR on or near the horizontal was weaker than on or near the vertical; (c) the magnitude of IR was greater - for stimulus lines lying in the upper half of the visual field than for stimulus lines lying in the lowerhalf. The difficulty - - of accounting for fixation point effects by means of physiological optics was discussed.