| 结构实在论评析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王巍. 结构实在论评析[J]. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2008, 3(2): 294-306. DOI: 10.1007/s11466-008-0019-5 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王巍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | Institute of Science,Technology and Society,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China |
| |
| 摘 要： |
|
| 关 键 词： | 结构实在论 结构 本体 建构 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-04-11 |
A critical analysis of structural realism |
| |
| Wei Wang. A critical analysis of structural realism[J]. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2008, 3(2): 294-306. DOI: 10.1007/s11466-008-0019-5 |
| |
| Authors: | Wei Wang |
| |
| Affiliation: | (1) Institute of Science, Technology and Society, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The epistemological version of structural realism, proposed by Cao Tianyu, has great influence in the philosophy of science. Syntheses has published a special volume discussing the topic. Cao criticizes anti-realism, as well as the epistemic and ontic versions of structural realism. From the concepts of structure, ontology, and construction, he analyzes the objectivity of scientific theories as having five aspects: construction, historicity, holism, revision, and revolution. This paper systematically analyzes and comments on Cao's structural realism. The author agrees with his criticism of the under-determination thesis, is neutral to his argument against ontological discontinuity, and questions his universal language argument. Translated by Yu Jinlong from Ziran Bianzhengfa Yanjiu 自然辩证法研究 (Studies in Dialectics of Nature), 2006, (11): 34–38 |
| |
| Keywords: | structural realism structure ontology construction |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
