排序方式: 共有11条查询结果,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
2.
Jeffrey Ketland 《Analysis》2000,60(268):319-328
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Jeffrey Ketland 《Synthese》2005,145(3):295-302
It is argued that Yablo’s Paradox is not strictly paradoxical, but rather ‘ω-paradoxical’. Under a natural formalization, the list of Yablo sentences may be constructed using a diagonalization argument and can be shown to be ω-inconsistent, but nonetheless consistent. The derivation of an inconsistency requires a uniform fixed-point construction. Moreover, the truth-theoretic disquotational principle required is also uniform, rather than the local disquotational T-scheme. The theory with the local disquotation T-scheme applied to individual sentences from the Yablo list is also consistent. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.