非精神病凶杀者在博彩测验上的决策特征

探究非精神病凶杀者在博彩测验上的决策特征,对26名凶杀组被试和43名对照组被试实施博彩测验,发现(C+D)-(A+B)在5个试验区间差异无统计学意义,而(A+C)-(B+D)在5个试验区间存差异有统计学意义.两组被试在A卡片选择上差异有统计学意义,在B、C、D卡片选择上差异无统计学意义.凶杀组在博彩测验上采用了比对照组更多冒险的决策,但是总体上无意识地选择了损失较少的卡片.     

不同5-HT3受体拮抗剂预防腹腔镜术后恶心呕吐的临床观察

观察使用不同5-HT3受体拮抗剂预防全麻下腹腔镜手术术后恶心呕吐的临床效果。选择160例气管内插管全身麻醉下腹腔镜手术,随机分四组,每组40例,手术结束前30min分别静脉注射昂丹司琼4mg（A组）;托烷司琼2mg（B组）;格拉司琼3mg（C组）;D组为对照组。记录术后2h、6h、12h、24h患者恶心、呕吐出现的例数。结果四组患者术后恶心呕吐的发生率是一个逐渐下降的趋势,A、B、C三组与D组相比较有显著性差异（P〈0．05）;术后2h、6h、12hB组与A组、C组相比较有显著性差异（P〈0．05）;而术后24hA、B、C三组差异无统计学意义,A、B、C三组抑制恶心呕吐的有效率分别为67．5％、87．5％和70．0％,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）,随访患者24h内无与药物相关的不良反应。结论：三种药物都能有效地预防术后恶心呕吐,但12h内托烷司琼的有效性更为明显。     

大学生不同认知方式对图形推理水平的影响--兼谈认知过程中的人格作用

用镶嵌图形测验方法从大学生中选出场独立性、场中间性和场依存性被试各32名．在分段限时条件下解决瑞文标准推理测验的B、C、D、E组问题。实验结果表明．认知方式不同组被试图形推理总成绩差异显著,场独立组最高、中间组次之、场依存组最低;随推理问题难度的渐增(B→C→D→E),认知方式的作用效果愈加明显,场独立组、中间组对图形类比推理(B组)、系统变化(C组)和系列关系(D组)的推理水平显著高于场依存组,对复杂抽象问题(E组)的推理水平场独立组显著高于中间组和场依存组;认知方式可解释图形推理总成绩25．9％的变异,年级可解释11．2％的变异。认知方式是影响图形推理水平的重要人格变量。     

脂肪干细胞复合脂肪颗粒促血管化的实验研究

本研究探讨脂肪干细胞复合脂肪颗粒对裸鼠皮下血管化的影响。将12只裸鼠身上标记三个点,将三组试剂分别注射,分析结果如下：肉眼观察：取材时,裸鼠背部注射部皮下有一团状组织块,脂肪组织形状不规则,大小不一。微血管密度：A组明显高于B组、C组,且差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）;B组明显高于c组,且差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。存活率比较：A组明显高于B组、C组,且差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）;B组明显高于C组,且差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。脂肪颗粒作为生物支架可加速脂肪干细胞的促血管化作用,从而促进移植物的存活与生长。     

应用项目反应理论对《中国士兵人格问卷》的项目分析

采用项目反应理论（IRT）对《中国士兵人格问卷》进行项目分析。计算机呈现中国士兵人格问卷（CSPQ）对100,523名适龄男性青年进行测验,随机抽取2676名任一维度标准分均低于70的定为合格组;将任一维度大于70分并经专业人员访谈不合格的274名定为不合格组;从精神病院抽取男性年龄相当的221名缓解期精神分裂症患者定为精神病组,并完成CSPQ测验。运用基于IRT的双参数Logistic模型进行分析;结果发现,区分度参数超过区间(0.30,4.00)的条目删除前后,被试的能力值与标准分均存在显著相关;精神病组的测验分数经IRT分析,图形曲线与不合格组有高度吻合。研究结果说明,在测验精度基本相同的条件下,应用IRT可以减少施测条目,提高测验效率,可在一定程度上更精确地区分被试的特质水平     

替罗非班以及不同给药途径对AMI患者PCI术后sICAM-1的影响

探讨替罗非班以及不同给药途径对急性心肌梗死（AMI）患者经皮冠状动脉介入术（PCI）后可溶性细胞间粘附因子-1（sICAM-1）的影响.选择AMI直接PCI患者90例随机分成A、B、C三组：A组不给予替罗非班;B组PCI术后静脉给予替罗非班,C组PCI术中对梗死相关冠状动脉（IRA）内注射替罗非班,两组均静脉滴注36h;分别检测三组术前及术后24h血浆sICAM-1的浓度水平.结果显示,A组PCI术后24h血浆sICAM-1的浓度水平较术前高,而B、C两组较术前均降低,差异有统计学意义（P＆lt;0.05）,但B、C两组PCI术后差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.因此,对于行PCI术的AMI患者应给予替罗非班,抑制术后炎症反应以及粘附反应,降低PCI术后再狭窄的发生率,但其作用效果与给药途径无关.     

三种不同方法治疗下肢深静脉血栓的比较

收集来宾市人民医院2015年2月～2018年2月收治的120例下肢深静脉血栓患者,分成三组,分别给予抗凝(A组)、抗凝+患肢溶栓(B组)、抗凝+下腔静脉滤器植入+导管溶栓治疗(C组),比较三组治疗的结果。A组25例有效,15例无效;B组31例有效,9例无效;C组35例有效,5例无效。A组与B组比较两组差异无统计学意义,B组与C组比较两组差异无统计学意义,A组与C组比较两组差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。A、B、C三组在下肢肿胀消退天数、下肢周径差、并发症、住院时间方面比较差异无统计学意义。在住院费用方面A组与B组无差异,A组与C组、B组与C组差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。抗凝+患肢溶栓治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成是安全、有效、经济适用的一种治疗方法。     

先天性心脏病合并肺动脉高压患者血清半乳糖凝集素-3的检测及临床意义

通过检测先心病肺动脉高压患者血清半乳糖凝集素－3水平，探讨其在先心病合肺动脉高压中的意义。收集2013年4月至2014年6月收治并被确诊为先心病的患者63例，其中肺动脉压力正常者（B组）21例；轻中度P H （C组）20例；重度P H （D组）22例，另收集健康正常对照组20例（A组）。应用酶联免疫吸附法检测血清半乳糖...     

不同植骨方式应用于退行性腰椎滑脱症后路手术的疗效分析

为了比较后路椎阎植骨融合（posterior lumber interbody fusion,PLIF）、后外侧植骨融合（posterolateral lumbar fusion,PLF）及二者联合运用（PLIF＋PLF）在退行性腰椎滑脱症后路手术中的疗效,对59例退行性腰椎滑脱症患者根据手术中植骨方式分为三组,回顾三组患者的临床资料,比较三种植骨融合方式手术时间、术中出血量、椎间隙高度、滑脱角、植骨融合率以及JOA评分改善率。结果显示：B组（PLF）的植骨融合率低于A组（PLIF）及C组（PLIF＋PLF）。在椎间隙高度维持、滑脱角丢失等方面A组优于B组（P〈0．05）,并且与C组无差异（P〉0．05）。在手术时间及术中出血量方面A组优于C组（P〈0．05）,并且与B组无差异（P〉0．05）。JOA评分改善率比较,三组间无显著性差异（P〉O0．05）。因此,得出结论：PLIF和PLF均是退行性腰椎滑脱症后路手术中的有效融合方式;PLIF及PLIF＋PLF的融合率优于PLF;综合分析PLIF应用于退行性腰椎滑脱症后路手术中优于PLF及PLIF＋PLF。     

不同情境下临场自我调节学习活动对学习结果的中介影响

探讨在两种学习目标（大致浏览与全面掌握）与两种时间压力（无时间限制提示与有时间限制提示）的情境下,６０名被试的临场自我调节学习活动水平对两种学习结果（选择题测验与作文）的中介影响。结果表明,在不同情境下,无论学习目标高低或时间压力大小,被试的选择题测验成绩均不存在显著差异;而作文成绩均存在显著差异;被试的临场自我调节学习活动存在显著差异;被试的部分临场自我调节学习活动对学习结果具有中介影响。     

Together – apart: in touch in a time of separation

This paper explores the experience of working as a Jungian analyst through the various phases of the global COVID-19 pandemic, examining the importance of the physical containing space alongside the analyst’s internal mind and how technology can both help and hinder understanding. A number of clinical vignettes illustrate the challenge of communicating over a distance, paying particular attention to the way countertransference phenomena can become re-attuned. Reference is made to mythology and symbols of hope, and consideration given to the meaning and purpose of the pandemic.     

Language,politics and dreams: the challenges of building resilience in refugees

This paper describes a case study of a 60-year-old Peruvian refugee in some detail, focusing on the importance of building emotional resilience in a patient in Spanish in order to create a space for learning the English language – the patient did not speak English after 20 years of living in Britain. The work was carried out with an interpreter and some of the literature on working with interpreters is referred to. The paper also briefly outlines the refugee journey in broad terms, which is a journey from the culturally known to the culturally unknown. The question of how well the literature on resilience, which sits firmly within a Western developmental perspective, can be applied to refugees, most of whom come from group and family-based cultures dominated by ideas of honour and shame, is discussed. The paper also touches on the importance of the receiving country enabling or not, as the case may be, a transitional space for refugees who have lost their home and are seeking to find a safe haven in a strange culture.     

The Possibility of Meaning in Human Evolution

Science undermines the certitude of non-naturalistic answers to the question of whether human life has meaning. I explore whether evolution can provide a naturalistic basis for existential meaning. Using the work of philosopher Daniel Dennett and scientist Ursula Goodenough, I argue that evolution is the locus of the possibility of meaning because it has produced intentionality, the matrix of consciousness. I conclude that the question of the meaning of human life is an existentialist one: existential meaning is a product of the individual and collective tasks human beings undertake.     

When is it time to stop? When good enough becomes bad enough

This article draws on Winnicott’s concept of the good enough mother to discuss how to know whether a therapeutic situation is good enough to continue or bad enough to end. This dilemma is explored in terms of clinical syndromes, such as anorexia and pathological gambling, but focuses mainly on analyst-initiated endings, which are termed the ‘Casablanca dilemma’, based on an amplification of the ending of the film Casablanca. The author goes on to discuss such one-sided endings, drawing on interviews with 40 analysts and therapists about their clinical experience. A typology of bad enough endings is presented. The psychological differences between a good enough analysis as opposed to a bad enough one are explored through the ideas of Winnicott and Neumann.     

The transcendent function in Spitteler’s Prometheus and Epimetheus

In August 2020, John Beebe and Steve Myers met via Zoom to discuss their differing interpretations of psychological typology and the different sources within Jung’s writings that influenced their books: Integrity in Depth: Energies and Patterns in Psychological Type (Beebe), and Myers-Briggs Typology vs Jungian Individuation (Myers). The discussion centred on Spitteler’s epic poem Prometheus und Epimetheus, which forms the basis of chapter V of Psychological Types. This is both the largest chapter and one of two chapters that Jung highlighted in the Argentine foreword as containing the essence of the book. Jung’s book is primarily about the transformation of personality rather than the categorization of people. Although it contains a critical psychology that deconstructs the nature of consciousness, that is only one half of the book and a stepping-stone to the other half, which is the reconciliation of opposites with particular emphasis on the relation of consciousness and the unconscious. Jung assumed that readers were already familiar with Prometheus und Epimetheus, an understanding of which sheds light on the nature of the transformation that Jung described – the development of a new attitude towards attitude itself.     

Kann Es Ein Argument Für Den Skeptizismus Geben? Das Epistemische Problem Der Irrtumsmöglichkeit

Summary  Is there any argument for scepticism? The epistemic problem of the possibility of error. Arguments for scepticism rest on the assumption that knowledge claims are fallible. For this reason the concept of knowledge appears to be questionable. Since it is necessary to distinguish doubts from possible doubts, the arguments for scepticism appear to be unconvincing. If we take it into account that we know something that is immune to doubt, we should draw the conclusion that, contrary to scepticism, knowledge claims have to be compatible with being fallible. Thus any knowledge claim is capable of being doubted.     

Chapter 6: Biblical Foundations for a Practical Theology of Aging

SUMMARY

This article reviews Biblical sources pertaining to the elderly, particularly the frail elderly. Founded on these sources, implications for elderly with Alzheimer's Disease and other forms of dementia are addressed through a personal perspective informed by writings of Christian mystics.     

Mythological Underpinnings of Feminine Development

In the manner of Oedipus Rex, the myth of Myrrha—a story about a daughter's initiation of sex with her father—promises to divulge insights about feminine development. Given parallels between these two myths, the author asks why Jung identified Electra rather than Myrrha as the feminine counterpart to Oedipus, and revisits Freud's and Jung's differing interpretations of the incest theme in personality development. To break open the metaphor of Myrrha's incest, the author analyzes a similar account of incest in the Old Testament story of Lot and his wife and finds that they share a theme of female bitterness related to wounding of the mother and its arresting effect on the daughter's maturation. The article then considers the Demeter-Persephone myth, a tale not of incest but rape in Persephone's initiation into womanhood. In contrast to Myrrha, Persephone's development unfolds with strong maternal support tempered by the opposing claims on her by the masculine. The article draws these stories together to illuminate the archetypal forces that drive feminine development as well as the human affairs that resist and complicate them. The article concludes with a case study of a client whose developmental “stuckness” follows the contours of the Myrrha myth.     

Order,disorder, and the absolute: An experiment in dialogue

The first section of this dialogue is excerpted from an edited conversation between Sean Kelly and the late David Bohm, and focuses on the concepts of order, disorder, and the Absolute. The second section explores these concepts in greater depth, with Bohm maintaining the impossibility of absolute knowledge and the fundamental unintelligibility of the concept of disorder, preferring instead to speak of “orders of infinite degree” which emerge out of an “unknown ground.” Kelly responds by proposing the concept of “absolute knowing” as the cognitive process within which the concepts of order and disorder, the known and the Unknown are seen as dialectically related moments of the Absolute as complex whole. The third section is Edgar Morin's response to the preceding dialogue. He begins by outlining his views on the nature and limits of rationality, maintaining, with Bohm, the superiority of the “negative modality” of speaking about “being” or “reality.” In the second part, however, he proposes the notion of nature as “chaosmos,” which he understands as a creative “dialogic” of order, disorder, and organization.